PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1948.82%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -0.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.70%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 11.67%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.08%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
58.14%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 200.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
136.39%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -192.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-301.92%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -523.06%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
153.71%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 432.83%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-195.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-374.24%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -241.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
143.62%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -180.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
22.75%
Lower CapEx growth vs. RUN's 210.49%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.74%
Growth of 97.74% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
156.27%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -5.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-63.66%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Buyback growth of 74.27% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.