1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 5.06%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
10.08%
D&A growth well above RUN's 11.76%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
85.55%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -359.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
3.65%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -0.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-59.85%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -113.39%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-0.82%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 123.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
79.04%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 79.60%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-227.44%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -115.52%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-1409.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -89.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1356.89%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -56.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-86.96%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -1725.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-74.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while RUN is 2.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.51%
Growth of 50.51% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
491.42%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -7.95%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
63.18%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -4167.49%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.81%
Buyback growth of 95.81% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.