PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-271.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -44.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
18.83%
D&A growth well above RUN's 6.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
3657.90%
Well above RUN's 108.92% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
6.11%
Less SBC growth vs. RUN's 25.15%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
63.38%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 720.91%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
598.86%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -236.63%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-149.08%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -499.36%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-8.83%
Negative yoy AP while RUN is 455.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-51.34%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 1190.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
35.89%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -99.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
50.99%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x RUN's 35.37%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-12.41%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -19.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-109.96%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.80%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. RUN's 200.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-149.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -7.61%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
99.60%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -328.62%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.