1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.89%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -2.90%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
8.76%
D&A growth well above RUN's 10.49%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
57.01%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -98.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
10.59%
Less SBC growth vs. RUN's 34.70%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-205.01%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -53.77%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-91.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -433.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
10.31%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -37.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
149.26%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -10.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-380.39%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 12.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
38.74%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RUN's 75214.29%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-185.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -21.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-41.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -23.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
611.40%
Acquisition growth of 611.40% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
We have some outflow growth while RUN is negative at -325.10%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.19%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -26.39%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-3342.90%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 31.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.02%
Buyback growth of 34.02% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.