PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.47%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -4.71%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.64%
D&A growth well above RUN's 6.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-102.85%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 2484.62%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.27%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -29.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-48.13%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -389.89%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-36.05%
AR is negative yoy while RUN is 137.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
63.94%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -20.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-176.98%
Both negative yoy AP, with RUN at -175.73%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
10.27%
Some yoy usage while RUN is negative at -96.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
117.59%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -31.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-24.60%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -132.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
42.23%
CapEx growth well above RUN's 11.01%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-111.59%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. RUN's 71.63%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-297.77%
We reduce yoy invests while RUN stands at 13.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
580.36%
Debt repayment above 1.5x RUN's 5.43%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1274.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.