PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.13%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 10.73%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
366.08%
Well above RUN's 110.59% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
16.69%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -6.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-208.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 133.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-152.69%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -266.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
25.58%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -11.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
80.49%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 260.50%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-116.26%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 97.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-80.87%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -50.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-27.51%
Negative yoy CFO while RUN is 85.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
14.27%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -11.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.01%
Growth well above RUN's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
28.50%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -11.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
7.43%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -89.51%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.23%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of RUN's 160.17%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.