PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.04%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -22.91%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
9.75%
D&A growth well above RUN's 2.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.59%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
9.21%
SBC growth while RUN is negative at -7.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
93.74%
Less working capital growth vs. RUN's 475.47%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
118.99%
AR growth well above RUN's 7.84%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
131.68%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -254.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 315.17%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
7.94%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RUN's 1420.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-75.38%
Negative yoy while RUN is 21.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
83.55%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -31.24%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-52.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -19.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-197.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.46%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-61.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -19.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-66.92%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 62.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -66.04%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.