PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-227.81%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 21.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.18%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 4.44%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
615.99%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -46.62%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-5.80%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -48.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
43.71%
Slight usage while RUN is negative at -254.80%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-228.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -3423.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-21.81%
Negative yoy inventory while RUN is 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
132.85%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -52.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-26.80%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -227.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
793.74%
Well above RUN's 40.53%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
47.66%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -43.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
8.55%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -12.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
1728.56%
Acquisition growth of 1728.56% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
280.77%
Growth well above RUN's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
3204.14%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -12.33%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-836.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -287.39%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.74%
Similar buyback growth to RUN's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel capital return priorities or a stable free cash flow for both.