PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.26%
Some net income increase while RUN is negative at -75.51%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.54%
Less D&A growth vs. RUN's 3.23%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
120.75%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -223.02%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-23.70%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -1.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-205.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while RUN is 307.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-35.53%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -141.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-164.56%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -80.12%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.76%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. RUN's 319.57%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-136.74%
Both negative yoy, with RUN at -166.85%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-466.37%
Negative yoy CFO while RUN is 152.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.73%
CapEx growth well above RUN's 15.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
151.94%
Growth well above RUN's 73.22%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
57.30%
Investing outflow well above RUN's 15.04%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-40.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 46.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1277.94%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.