PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.45%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with RUN at -7.60%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-32.11%
Negative yoy D&A while RUN is 9.35%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-38525.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 370.63%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-20.65%
Negative yoy SBC while RUN is 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
126.73%
Well above RUN's 69.23% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
104.80%
AR growth well above RUN's 114.21%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-125.59%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with RUN at -46.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
111.69%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -60.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-69.46%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 153.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
73.95%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. RUN's 328.27%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
55.50%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x RUN's 27.25%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-52.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -5.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-111.53%
Negative yoy acquisition while RUN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17330.70%
Growth of 17330.70% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
707.59%
We have mild expansions while RUN is negative at -7.30%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-83.41%
We cut debt repayment yoy while RUN is 29.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.77%
Buyback growth of 40.77% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.