PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
128.32%
Net income growth above 1.5x RUN's 22.69%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
18.05%
Some D&A expansion while RUN is negative at -2.13%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
395.60%
Some yoy growth while RUN is negative at -257.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
63.76%
SBC growth well above RUN's 0.47%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-207.91%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -1284.19%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-801.27%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with RUN at -311.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
55.84%
Some inventory rise while RUN is negative at -655.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
62.45%
Lower AP growth vs. RUN's 629.30%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
-1072.33%
Negative yoy usage while RUN is 473.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
42.80%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -8.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
93.62%
Some CFO growth while RUN is negative at -98.77%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
67.09%
Some CapEx rise while RUN is negative at -5.76%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
328.08%
Acquisition growth of 328.08% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-48.14%
We reduce yoy other investing while RUN is 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-64.49%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -4.43%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
975.10%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -102.21%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.96%
We cut yoy buybacks while RUN is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.