PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-112.00%
Negative net income growth while RUN stands at 31.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.99%
D&A growth well above RUN's 6.08%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-122.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while RUN stands at 53.15%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-9.82%
Both cut yoy SBC, with RUN at -41.35%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-285.82%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -77.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
129.25%
AR growth while RUN is negative at -1529.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
53.27%
Inventory growth well above RUN's 80.81%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
69.14%
A yoy AP increase while RUN is negative at -87.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-106.69%
Both reduce yoy usage, with RUN at -76.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
109.60%
Some yoy increase while RUN is negative at -318.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-367.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with RUN at -22.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-2.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -2.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -54.68%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.10%
We reduce yoy sales while RUN is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
100.00%
We have some outflow growth while RUN is negative at -177.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-101.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with RUN at -288.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
110.53%
We repay more while RUN is negative at -127.41%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.72%
Buyback growth of 51.72% while RUN is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.