PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
139.84%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -26.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-46.85%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -64.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
9.25%
Deferred tax of 9.25% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-188.27%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
69.07%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -386.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-50.22%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 818.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
283.51%
AP growth of 283.51% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-167.20%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
187.63%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SEDG's 14281.79%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-7700.00%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -123.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
13.90%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 87.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 126.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
9.56%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.72%
Negative yoy issuance while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.