PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.24%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -26.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
23.02%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -64.79%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
234.21%
Deferred tax of 234.21% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
7.24%
SBC growth while SEDG is negative at -38.71%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-3243.32%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-63.45%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -386.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
58.57%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SEDG's 818.52%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-248.28%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-396.81%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1274.77%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 14281.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-459.13%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -123.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-29.72%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 87.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SEDG at -24.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
62.93%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 126.60%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
81.13%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.46%
Buyback growth of 32.46% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.