PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -26.61%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-11.73%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SEDG at -64.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
4394.55%
Deferred tax of 4394.55% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-8.03%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -38.71%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-20.41%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
153.24%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -386.98%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-107.15%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 818.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-119.52%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
36.75%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-89.45%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 14281.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-31.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -123.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
28.88%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 87.58%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth well above SEDG's 126.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
64.47%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-3049.75%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.