PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1948.82%
Net income growth of 1948.82% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest advantage that can compound if well-managed.
0.70%
D&A growth of 0.70% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
SBC growth of 15.01% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
58.14%
Working capital change of 58.14% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
136.39%
AR growth of 136.39% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-301.92%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
153.71%
AP growth of 153.71% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-195.30%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-374.24%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
143.62%
CFO growth of 143.62% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
22.75%
CapEx growth of 22.75% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.74%
Growth of 97.74% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
156.27%
We expand invests by 156.27% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-63.66%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Buyback growth of 74.27% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.