PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.35%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 45.16%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-18.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 3.61%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
102.77%
Deferred tax of 102.77% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-41.45%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-106.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -54.18%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
1568.36%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -159.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-230.31%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 615.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-1531.15%
Negative yoy AP while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-73.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -41.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-45.73%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 112.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-126.11%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 3.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
46.04%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 74.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.39%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 96.05%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
44.56%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 7.32%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
124.99%
Debt repayment growth of 124.99% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-620.21%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.