PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.13%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SEDG's 58.90%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
366.08%
Deferred tax of 366.08% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
16.69%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 11.68%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-208.26%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -48.98%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-152.69%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 95.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
25.58%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -27.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
80.49%
A yoy AP increase while SEDG is negative at -179.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-116.26%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 399.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-80.87%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 6.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-27.51%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 23.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
14.27%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -206.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
114.01%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -5.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
28.50%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -282.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
7.43%
Debt repayment growth of 7.43% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.23%
Buyback growth of 96.23% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.