PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.04%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 24.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
9.75%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 11.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-72.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.21%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 12.47%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
93.74%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -142.31%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
118.99%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -3477.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
131.68%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -230.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
AP growth well above SEDG's 186.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
7.94%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SEDG's 55.61%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-75.38%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 27.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
83.55%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 6.05%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-52.37%
Negative yoy CapEx while SEDG is 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-197.33%
Negative yoy acquisition while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.46%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 295.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-61.84%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 103.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-66.92%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.