PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-850.58%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -30.28%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
19.42%
D&A growth well above SEDG's 23.36%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-3045.17%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.12%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 18.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1583.68%
Well above SEDG's 1488.99% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-781.38%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -52.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
205.09%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -236.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.87%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 198.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
16231.66%
Well above SEDG's 44.70%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
279.96%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SEDG's 36.48%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-84.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -46.26%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
175.37%
Some acquisitions while SEDG is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.15%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -117.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-68.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -3044.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
461.78%
Debt repayment growth of 461.78% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.14%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.