PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
80.31%
Net income growth similar to SEDG's 82.99%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-27.78%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 9.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
95.97%
Deferred tax of 95.97% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-24.11%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 27.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-260.72%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 1.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
139.52%
AR growth well above SEDG's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-218.83%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 25.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-170.14%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -49.25%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-131.53%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 27.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-92.63%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-587.06%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 39.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
71.22%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -38.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
539.37%
Acquisition growth of 539.37% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
100.00%
Purchases well above SEDG's 58.44%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.13%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SEDG's 16285.71%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
90.18%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 93.66%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-80.86%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1136.61%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.