PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.26%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SEDG's 47.95%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
0.54%
Less D&A growth vs. SEDG's 38.48%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
120.75%
Deferred tax of 120.75% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-23.70%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 11.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-205.26%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 11.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-35.53%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 59.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-164.56%
Negative yoy inventory while SEDG is 146.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.76%
Growth well above SEDG's 116.31%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-136.74%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -74.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-466.37%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
40.73%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -24.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above SEDG's 52.92%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SEDG at -16.16%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
151.94%
Growth well above SEDG's 99.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
57.30%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 46.83%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-40.11%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1277.94%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.