PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 83.10%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-6.85%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 23.28%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.20%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
10.66%
SBC growth well above SEDG's 17.19%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
12.88%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -100.92%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-598.75%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -566.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
51.13%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -21.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
180.11%
AP growth well above SEDG's 225.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
52.74%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -59.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-513.32%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 296.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
45.61%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -10.04%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.82%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -9.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 2236.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
74.10%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -106.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
61.07%
We repay more while SEDG is negative at -287.64%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Buyback growth of 87.27% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.