PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-94.66%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -15.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
18.09%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -6.15%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
3.05%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -164.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-17.23%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 7.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-115.10%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SEDG is 84.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
109.33%
AR growth well above SEDG's 43.20%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-1446.12%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SEDG at -60.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
292.60%
AP growth well above SEDG's 130.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-358.11%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
107.84%
Well above SEDG's 78.65%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-119.63%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 1902.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
61.42%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -33.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-89.58%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -99.23%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2709.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -74.90%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-106.13%
We reduce yoy invests while SEDG stands at 33.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
107.83%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 95.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.89%
We cut yoy buybacks while SEDG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.