PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.41%
Some net income increase while SEDG is negative at -13.64%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
52.52%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -1.51%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
134.72%
Well above SEDG's 5.70% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
25.91%
SBC growth while SEDG is negative at -0.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
92.45%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -58.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-4.51%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SEDG at -227.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
35.12%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 26.04%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
105.06%
AP growth well above SEDG's 155.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
947.03%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -99.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-106.77%
Negative yoy while SEDG is 95.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
85.81%
Some CFO growth while SEDG is negative at -1219.66%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-20.07%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -45.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.72%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 548.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1996.72%
We reduce yoy other investing while SEDG is 100.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-156.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with SEDG at -13.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
130.19%
Debt repayment growth of 130.19% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x SEDG's 4.32%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.