PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.21%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -151.19%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-98.03%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 15.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-79.51%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-35.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -5.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
843.36%
Well above SEDG's 116.82% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
216.47%
AR growth well above SEDG's 208.32%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
281.62%
Some inventory rise while SEDG is negative at -83.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-2710.57%
Both negative yoy AP, with SEDG at -212.76%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.22%
Negative yoy usage while SEDG is 9951.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1908.77%
Well above SEDG's 2247.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-5.06%
Negative yoy CFO while SEDG is 145.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.77%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SEDG's 16.48%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
89.85%
Acquisition spending well above SEDG's 93.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while SEDG is 43.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
91.97%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -293.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
71.97%
Investing outflow well above SEDG's 42.96%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.07%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SEDG is 51.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.91%
Buyback growth below 50% of SEDG's 89.51%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.