PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-143.07%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SEDG at -165.44%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5049.33%
Some D&A expansion while SEDG is negative at -0.77%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
681.03%
Some yoy growth while SEDG is negative at -135.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-9.62%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SEDG at -5.12%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
11.20%
Slight usage while SEDG is negative at -137.39%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-17.25%
AR is negative yoy while SEDG is 72.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-92.90%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SEDG at -32.07%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
94.07%
AP growth well above SEDG's 56.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
43679.13%
Some yoy usage while SEDG is negative at -220.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-94.60%
Both negative yoy, with SEDG at -22.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-39.92%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SEDG at -444.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
17.37%
CapEx growth well above SEDG's 13.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
100.00%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. SEDG's 205.04%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.24%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -238.42%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
15.91%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -84.54%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
6800.00%
We repay more while SEDG is negative at -15.11%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.20%
Buyback growth at 75-90% of SEDG's 101.75%. Bill Ackman would call for more share repurchases if undervaluation is evident, to match competitor’s approach.