PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-44.84%
Negative net income growth while SEDG stands at 16.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-7.84%
Negative yoy D&A while SEDG is 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.35%
Negative yoy SBC while SEDG is 2.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
94.01%
Well above SEDG's 166.34% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
34.43%
AR growth while SEDG is negative at -49.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
167.41%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 144.46%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
118.24%
AP growth well above SEDG's 83.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-206.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SEDG at -376.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
277.23%
Some yoy increase while SEDG is negative at -134.16%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.59%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SEDG's 79.37%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
35.26%
Some CapEx rise while SEDG is negative at -22.17%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.26%
We have some outflow growth while SEDG is negative at -416.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
35.26%
We have mild expansions while SEDG is negative at -36.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while SEDG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.