PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
25.35%
Net income growth at 50-75% of Solar median of 45.16%. Guy Spier would suspect a partial underperformance in profitability vs. the sector.
-18.07%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is -10.43%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
102.77%
Deferred tax growth of 102.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-41.45%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-106.77%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
1568.36%
Under 50% of Solar median of 87.35% if it’s negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential red flags in receivables if growth is too large or out of line with revenue.
-230.31%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-1531.15%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-73.25%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-45.73%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is -77.57%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-126.11%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
46.04%
CapEx growth of 46.04% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.39%
Growth of 6.39% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
44.56%
Investing flow of 44.56% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
124.99%
Debt repayment growth of 124.99% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-620.21%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.