PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.12%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -43.92%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-2.76%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-726.54%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
16.21%
SBC growth of 16.21% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
154.38%
Working capital of 154.38% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
225.63%
AR growth of 225.63% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
331.25%
Inventory growth of 331.25% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
17.14%
Growth of 17.14% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
3971.78%
Under 50% of Solar median of 10.98% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
83.73%
CFO growth of 83.73% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-90.66%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-240.53%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-237.82%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-61.21%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.48%
Buyback growth of 19.48% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.