PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
205.27%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 43.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-6.85%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 2.19%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-100.20%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
10.66%
SBC growth of 10.66% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
12.88%
A slight increase while Solar median is negative at -30.66%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
-598.75%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
51.13%
Inventory growth of 51.13% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
180.11%
AP growth of 180.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
52.74%
Growth of 52.74% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-513.32%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
45.61%
Positive CFO growth while Solar median is negative at -10.04%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
19.82%
CapEx growth of 19.82% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.64%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
74.10%
Investing flow of 74.10% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
61.07%
Debt repayment growth of 61.07% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
87.27%
Buyback growth of 87.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.