PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-117.45%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 31.75%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-32.11%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-38525.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-20.65%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
126.73%
Working capital of 126.73% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
104.80%
AR growth of 104.80% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-125.59%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
111.69%
AP growth of 111.69% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-69.46%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 9.56%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
73.95%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -38.41%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
55.50%
CFO growth of 55.50% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-52.66%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is -2.28%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-111.53%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17330.70%
Growth of 17330.70% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
707.59%
Investing flow of 707.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-83.41%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.77%
Buyback growth of 40.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.