PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.72%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative at -27.27%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
30.42%
D&A growth of 30.42% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-101.41%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-110.48%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-741.88%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.78%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
110.75%
Growth of 110.75% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-68.96%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-109.07%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-413.81%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
81.97%
Proceeds growth of 81.97% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
20.51%
Growth of 20.51% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-74.28%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.03%
Buyback growth of 50.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.