PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
106.88%
Net income growth of 106.88% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
3.48%
D&A growth of 3.48% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-100.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
23.36%
SBC growth of 23.36% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-167.34%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-378.08%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
676.45%
Inventory growth of 676.45% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-163.33%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-40.25%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
10.11%
Growth of 10.11% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-139.66%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
41.88%
CapEx growth of 41.88% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-660.94%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-268.94%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
93.86%
Debt repayment growth of 93.86% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.31%
Buyback growth of 49.31% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.