PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.71%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-15.17%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is -2.16%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-121.56%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-0.78%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-69.90%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
126.87%
AR growth of 126.87% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-158.13%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-213.14%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
100.93%
Growth of 100.93% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
127.29%
A moderate rise while Energy median is negative at -1.29%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-192.69%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is -17.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
45.69%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 18.86% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
68.83%
Under 50% of Energy median of 9.87% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-374.75%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.