PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.04%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 0.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
9.75%
D&A growth of 9.75% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-72.59%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
9.21%
SBC growth of 9.21% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
93.74%
Working capital of 93.74% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
118.99%
AR growth of 118.99% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
131.68%
Inventory growth of 131.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
7.94%
Growth of 7.94% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-75.38%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 3.18%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
83.55%
CFO growth of 83.55% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-52.37%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-197.33%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.46%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-61.84%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-66.92%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.