1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
76.46%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 21.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-35.85%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-11.27%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-3.82%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
17.99%
Working capital of 17.99% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
16.15%
AR growth of 16.15% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
32.92%
Inventory growth of 32.92% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-78.12%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
36.80%
Growth of 36.80% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-99.53%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is -17.67%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-32.48%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
6.25%
CapEx growth of 6.25% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.24%
Growth of 29.24% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-104.70%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
151.93%
Debt repayment growth of 151.93% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.68%
Buyback growth of 6.68% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.