PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.26%
Net income growth of 39.26% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
0.54%
D&A growth of 0.54% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
120.75%
Deferred tax growth of 120.75% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-23.70%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-205.26%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is -101.07%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-35.53%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-164.56%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.76%
Some yoy usage while Energy median is negative at -17.66%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
-136.74%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 4.76%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-466.37%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is -19.46%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
40.73%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 7.64% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
151.94%
Growth of 151.94% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
57.30%
Investing flow of 57.30% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-40.11%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1277.94%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.