PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-119.63%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 1.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
165.44%
D&A growth of 165.44% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
118.57%
Deferred tax growth of 118.57% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
30.31%
SBC growth of 30.31% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
58.77%
Working capital of 58.77% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
5.03%
AR growth of 5.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
151.37%
Inventory growth of 151.37% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-87.76%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
39.26%
Growth of 39.26% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
6295.31%
Growth of 6295.31% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
48.66%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 1.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-39.32%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-9.77%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.23%
Buyback growth of 69.23% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.