PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.41%
Net income growth of 39.41% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
52.52%
D&A growth of 52.52% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
134.72%
Deferred tax growth of 134.72% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
25.91%
SBC growth of 25.91% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
92.45%
Working capital of 92.45% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-4.51%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
35.12%
Inventory growth of 35.12% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
105.06%
AP growth of 105.06% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
947.03%
Growth of 947.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-106.77%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
85.81%
CFO growth of 85.81% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-20.07%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-88.72%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-1996.72%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-156.15%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
130.19%
Debt repayment growth of 130.19% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
75.88%
Buyback growth of 75.88% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.