PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.37%
Negative revenue growth while CSIQ stands at 18.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
13.53%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of CSIQ's 18.23%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
15.18%
Positive EBIT growth while CSIQ is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.86%
Operating income growth above 1.5x CSIQ's 10.57%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-20.79%
Negative net income growth while CSIQ stands at 4.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-23.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-21.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.33%
Share reduction more than 1.5x CSIQ's 23.91%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.54%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x CSIQ's 21.26%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
391.18%
OCF growth of 391.18% while CSIQ is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
743.93%
FCF growth of 743.93% while CSIQ is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
495.16%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of CSIQ's 4216.63%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
205.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 205.81% while CSIQ is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of CSIQ's 812.11%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.84%
Equity/share CAGR of 291.84% while CSIQ is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while CSIQ shows 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.88%
Inventory is declining while CSIQ stands at 12.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.42%
Asset growth well under 50% of CSIQ's 40.56%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.64%
Under 50% of CSIQ's 22.14%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. CSIQ's 34.90%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.64%
SG&A declining or stable vs. CSIQ's 36.54%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.