PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.67%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
56.16%
Positive gross profit growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
197.71%
Positive EBIT growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
482.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
36.18%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
-48.15%
Negative EPS growth while ENPH is at 21.74%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-50.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ENPH is at 22.73%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
4.18%
Slight or no buybacks while ENPH is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.13%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2691.15%
Positive OCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
166.65%
Positive FCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
419.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
764.13%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106.84%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to ENPH's 112.35%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.20%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ENPH's 17.72%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-9.01%
Inventory is declining while ENPH stands at 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.77%
Asset growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-0.99%
We have a declining book value while ENPH shows 9.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.58%
Debt growth far above ENPH's 2.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
20.39%
We increase R&D while ENPH cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.07%
We expand SG&A while ENPH cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.