PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
56.67%
Positive revenue growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
56.16%
Positive gross profit growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
197.71%
Positive EBIT growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
482.57%
Positive operating income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
36.18%
Positive net income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-48.15%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-50.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.18%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.54%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-2.13%
Reduced diluted shares while FSLR is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2691.15%
OCF growth above 1.5x FSLR's 676.94%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
166.65%
FCF growth under 50% of FSLR's 397.99%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
419.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 1069.21%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
764.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 764.13% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.48%
Below 50% of FSLR's 7646.98%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106.84%
Below 50% of FSLR's 1252.46%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.20%
Our AR growth while FSLR is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.01%
Inventory is declining while FSLR stands at 9.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.77%
Similar asset growth to FSLR's 6.35%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-0.99%
We have a declining book value while FSLR shows 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
7.58%
We have some new debt while FSLR reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
20.39%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. FSLR's 29.73%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.07%
We expand SG&A while FSLR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.