PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of FSLR's 28.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-41.96%
Negative gross profit growth while FSLR is at 22.97%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-413.65%
Negative EBIT growth while FSLR is at 60.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-51.69%
Negative operating income growth while FSLR is at 60.69%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-198.26%
Negative net income growth while FSLR stands at 75.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-197.56%
Negative EPS growth while FSLR is at 75.25%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-197.56%
Negative diluted EPS growth while FSLR is at 74.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.16%
Share reduction while FSLR is at 0.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x FSLR's 0.89%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
545.05%
OCF growth under 50% of FSLR's 1367.89%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
236.46%
FCF growth under 50% of FSLR's 923.29%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
7017.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 15676.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
92.06%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of FSLR's 359.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 60.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
5178.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 5178.66% while FSLR is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
328.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 181.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
21.67%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-757.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while FSLR is at 1923.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1985.35%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while FSLR is 110.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-12189.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR is 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.00%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 181.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-42.32%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while FSLR is at 30.32%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.42%
Firm’s AR is declining while FSLR shows 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-28.44%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.63%
Asset growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 6.13%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
-11.19%
We have a declining book value while FSLR shows 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.61%
Debt growth far above FSLR's 6.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
18.15%
We increase R&D while FSLR cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
46.11%
We expand SG&A while FSLR cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.