PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-21.43%
Negative revenue growth while FSLR stands at 20.73%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-42.33%
Negative gross profit growth while FSLR is at 52.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
111.92%
EBIT growth below 50% of FSLR's 2973.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
64.58%
Operating income growth under 50% of FSLR's 2973.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1454.16%
Positive net income growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1511.76%
Positive EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1581.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.70%
Share count expansion well above FSLR's 0.31%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above FSLR's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.51%
OCF growth at 75-90% of FSLR's 129.27%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
107.53%
FCF growth similar to FSLR's 106.38%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-48.37%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-26.79%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while FSLR stands at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
117.10%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x FSLR's 55.08%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
107.70%
Below 50% of FSLR's 922.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
110.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of FSLR's 186.74%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
275.24%
Positive 10Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
135.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
116.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while FSLR is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-98.79%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while FSLR stands at 39.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-98.37%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-96.52%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.01%
Inventory is declining while FSLR stands at 5.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.95%
Negative asset growth while FSLR invests at 1.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
104.47%
BV/share growth above 1.5x FSLR's 0.81%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-21.12%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.15%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.