PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-91.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-117.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
52.17%
Positive operating income growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-19.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
5.26%
Positive EPS growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
-2636.84%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MAXN's 8.34%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.11%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MAXN's 8.34%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.64%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
37.43%
Positive FCF growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-54.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-19.07%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
52.14%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-148.30%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
89.98%
Positive OCF/share growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.23%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-123.86%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
66.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MAXN is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-181.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MAXN is 19.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-72.89%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while MAXN stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
707.78%
Equity/share CAGR of 707.78% while MAXN is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
4083.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while MAXN is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-23.48%
Inventory is declining while MAXN stands at 10.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-8.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-11.43%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-9.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-16.93%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-79.07%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.