PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.67%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SEDG's 9.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
139.12%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 12.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
505.40%
EBIT growth above 1.5x SEDG's 80.09%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
616.64%
Operating income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 80.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
320.55%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 33.93%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
329.17%
EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 4.60%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
315.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 11.43%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 28.15%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-1.82%
Reduced diluted shares while SEDG is at 20.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
477.41%
OCF growth under 50% of SEDG's 3846.90%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
156.59%
FCF growth under 50% of SEDG's 698.10%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
10938.99%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
53.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
53.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4077.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 117.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-4.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 117.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-32.03%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 117.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
821.32%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 103.18% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
10067.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 103.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
220.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 103.18%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.49%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-10.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.06%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. SEDG's 65.12%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
6.77%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SEDG's 60.23%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.43%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 10.95%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
10.92%
Under 50% of SEDG's 38.97%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
7.10%
We have some new debt while SEDG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
31.43%
We increase R&D while SEDG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.93%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 2.40%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.