PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.60%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SEDG's 8.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-4711.83%
Negative gross profit growth while SEDG is at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-274.31%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-256.54%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-285.53%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-281.93%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-281.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.51%
Share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 3.24%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.51%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 1.30%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.66%
Positive OCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
42.53%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-33.88%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-33.15%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
12.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 98.68%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-329.39%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 154.61%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-58.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 154.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
45.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 140.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-908.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is at 170.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-2061.24%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is 170.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-6649.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG is 221.37%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-97.97%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 256.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-96.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 256.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-97.83%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 150.07%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
Our AR growth while SEDG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.89%
Inventory growth well above SEDG's 3.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-18.85%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-75.77%
We have a declining book value while SEDG shows 6.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-16.71%
We’re deleveraging while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
65.82%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SEDG's 9.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.34%
We cut SG&A while SEDG invests at 3.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.