PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SEDG's 1.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
97.18%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
13.62%
Positive EBIT growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
104.53%
Positive operating income growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
136.23%
Net income growth above 1.5x SEDG's 26.79%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
136.36%
EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 25.58%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
127.27%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x SEDG's 27.16%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
6.93%
Share count expansion well above SEDG's 0.96%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.44%
Slight or no buyback while SEDG is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.62%
OCF growth above 1.5x SEDG's 20.91%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
76.88%
Positive FCF growth while SEDG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-31.22%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-55.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 344.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-46.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 225.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-101.54%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 213.78%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-101.62%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG is at 569.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.43%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SEDG stands at 191.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
253.98%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 138.78% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-96.52%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while SEDG is 1118.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
101.80%
Below 50% of SEDG's 368.99%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-99.54%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-99.43%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 5077.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-99.08%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 143.89%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.30%
Firm’s AR is declining while SEDG shows 30.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-57.94%
Inventory is declining while SEDG stands at 27.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
14.94%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 11.74%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
112.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SEDG's 9.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.93%
We have some new debt while SEDG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
13.42%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SEDG's 13.51%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
9.49%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 3.48%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.