PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.27%
Revenue growth above 1.5x SEDG's 11.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.71%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-233.84%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-90.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-91.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-89.47%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-89.47%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while SEDG is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SEDG's 3.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.66%
OCF growth under 50% of SEDG's 147.50%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
41.15%
FCF growth under 50% of SEDG's 113.94%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-52.25%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
2.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 302.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-21.57%
Negative 3Y CAGR while SEDG stands at 93.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
14.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of SEDG's 178.98%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
72.34%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of SEDG's 84.07%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
43.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SEDG's 31.94%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
48.93%
Below 50% of SEDG's 125.08%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
46.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while SEDG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-142.56%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-75.77%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while SEDG stands at 637.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-55.61%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while SEDG is at 354.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
313.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SEDG's 160.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.84%
Our AR growth while SEDG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-9.40%
Inventory is declining while SEDG stands at 8.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.18%
Negative asset growth while SEDG invests at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
16.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SEDG's 2.38%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.70%
We have some new debt while SEDG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
47.80%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SEDG's 12.81%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
20.84%
SG&A growth well above SEDG's 8.67%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.